
The story is about the do's and don'ts of buffet eating. This man is clearly displaying a dont. Evidently the editor wanted a do but didn't bother to tell me that.
I had an interesting discussion with the features editor over this pic. His concern was because I cropped out the head of the subject he wondered if readers would wonder about the identity of the eater. My arguement was that because I cut off the head of the diner, he becomes an "everyman". The editor was also concerned that because I asked the diner his name, he might assume that his image would appear in the paper and would be disappointed that I cut off his head. One-It's my job to get thier names, Two-I don't think we can allow what our subjects May assume dictate how art is edited.
5 comments:
I think you had the right idea with keeping the identity anonymous. As you said that makes everyone identify. The only thing I think might could have been different would be to have shot a fat person doing this. But then again I see that on TV news all the time and I wonder what people must be thinking at home when they see their t-shirt and belly in a clip with a story on obesity.
Keep up the good work though and don't sweat the editors. You have a ton of talent over there.
Your features editor is wrong on all counts.
thanks guys. i think your right. sometimes editors can be wrong.
He always was a pig...so putting his name there just makes people know that he is a pig through and through!
Also notice that he isnt wearing his wedding ring! How typical!
Post a Comment